From: Mark Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Mar 23 2005 - 20:16:49 CST
That's exactly the kind of feedback I need, about possible problems with
different approaches. I hope that others also look at the charts and review
the implications for languages they are familiar with.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Constable" <email@example.com>
To: "Unicode Mailing List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "UnicoRe Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 17:55
Subject: RE: Security Issues
> > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Behalf Of Mark Davis
> > A. Currently, compatibility decomposables are mapped to their NFKC
> > So
> > if you type in a half-width katakana form, it will map to the
> > form. There is a proposal to simply forbid compatibility decomposable
> > instead of mapping them. Is this acceptable (eg in Japan)?
> This will mean that e.g. U+0E33 THAI CHARACTER SARA AM will not be
> usable in IDN. That could be a serious problem in Thailand. And three
> Lao characters that are commonly used would be blocked, which would be a
> problem in Laos.
> Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 24 2005 - 09:53:31 CST