From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 18:10:33 CST
At 15:51 -0800 2005-03-31, Patrick Andries wrote:
>>U+004E U+1D52 U+02E2
>Correct, I must have last tried this before Unicode 4.0, before
>U+1D52 was introduced.
>(I'm not sure anyone uses these characters to write N<sup>os</sup>
>in real life though).
It does suggest that the DEGREE sign is not "really" the right
character for the second part of the Numero sign. In my view either
U+1D52 or Masculine Ordinal would be preferable (if the latter has no
underbar, since U+02E2 has no underbar).
I can hear Ken groan at this misuse of characters.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 18:17:27 CST