Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 22:09:28 CST

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: U+0023"
In reply to: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Sinnathurai Srivas <sisrivas at blueyonder dot co dot uk> wrote:

> Let's go to the point.
>
> Do not probagate untrue messages as part of continuation policy.
>
> LET US FIND A PROPER OPERATING MODE for this problem.

There are other characters in the standard that have misleading or even
incorrect names. These will not be changed either, and it is not due to
any effort to insult anyone, or anyone's culture, nation, language,
religion, or heritage.

Character names are just strings. I don't know anyone who uses the term
"low line" to refer to U+005F.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: James Kass: "Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: U+0023"
In reply to: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: Tamil 0B83: Tamil Aytham and Devanagari VisargaL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 22:12:57 CST