Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:36:44 CST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"

    At 10:37 -0800 2005-04-01, Patrick Andries wrote:

    >I'm a bit surprised though that it made it in
    >Unicode (could be construed as a ligature of !?

    That would, I think, be an inappropriate
    unification. Punctuation does not normally ligate.

    >and doesn't seem to have caught on and be more
    >widepread than other innovative punctuation
    >marks like the point d'ironie (but it is not
    >American ;-)).

    Alcanter de Brahm's invention? Why not encode it?

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:41:01 CST