From: Mark E. Shoulson (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Apr 03 2005 - 19:00:39 CST
Michael Everson wrote:
> At 10:37 -0800 2005-04-01, Patrick Andries wrote:
>> I'm a bit surprised though that it made it in Unicode (could be
>> construed as a ligature of !?
> That would, I think, be an inappropriate unification. Punctuation does
> not normally ligate.
>> and doesn't seem to have caught on and be more widepread than other
>> innovative punctuation marks like the « point d'ironie » (but it is
>> not American ;-)).
> Alcanter de Brahm's invention? Why not encode it?
OK, I never heard of that and had to search around to find some
pictures. It seems to me that a case could be made for this being a
glyph variant of U+061F ARABIC QUESTION MARK
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 19:02:02 CST