Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)

From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:03:28 CST

Next message: Philippe VERDY: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"

Previous message: Joe: "RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Patrick Andries wrote:

> I'm a bit surprised though that it made it in Unicode (could be
> construed as a ligature of !? and doesn't seem to have caught on and be
> more widepread than other innovative punctuation marks like the « point
> d'ironie » (but it is not American ;-)).

Don't get me started

http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/30/64684.html

-- 
Tiro Typeworks        www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC        tiro@tiro.com
Currently reading:
A century of philosophy, by Hans Georg Gadamer
David Jones: artist and poet, ed. Paul Hills

Next message: Philippe VERDY: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Previous message: Joe: "RE: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Use of U+203D (interrobang)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 14:04:07 CST