From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:32:37 CST
"Philippe Verdy" <email@example.com> writes:
>> Yes. New CJK compatibility ideographs U+FA70..U+FAD9 have canonical
>> decompositions into single characters. For example NFC(U+FACF) =
>> U+2284A (for the first time a BMP character is normalized to something
>> outside BMP).
> Isn't that against Unicode statibility? Shouldn't it have been the
> reverse, keeping U+FACF stable and normalizing U+2284A to U+FACF to
> keep the compatibility?
I said *new* CJK compatibility ideographs. U+FA70..U+FAD9 were
unassigned in earlier versions of Unicode.
-- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ firstname.lastname@example.org ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 15:33:17 CST