From: Mark E. Shoulson (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Apr 12 2005 - 20:39:25 CST
Edward H. Trager wrote:
>In as much as no one wants the standard to include incorrect and meaningless things, then
>I think it is perfectly reasonable to contemplate changing incorrect and meaningless names.
>But perhaps we can conclude that it is not a high priority on the agendas of the relevant parties.
>For anyone to say, "it cannot be changed and won't be changed" without a very good explanation
>of *why* it cannot be changed just sounds like some sort of hubris in this mailing list, probably
>not intended, but that's what it sounds like.
But explanations were given. The Unicode stability policy has been
stated and explained, and it's there for a reason.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 12 2005 - 20:41:02 CST