From: Peter Kirk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Apr 16 2005 - 04:10:24 CST
On 15/04/2005 01:41, John Hudson wrote:
> Peter Kirk wrote:
>> But I thought Ken had just told us that error reports on character
>> names made through these channels would be ignored. In fact Ken's
>> words were:
>>> ... both committees to decide that past a certain point
>>> such defect reports would be noted but not acted upon, insofar
>>> as they were requests for changes in names of published characters
>>> in the standards.
> *insofar as they were requests for changes in names of published
> characters in the standards*
> In other words, error reports requesting e.g. annotations to the
> standard may be acted upon since they do not involve changes to names.
Of course. And, despite what Otto claimed afterwards, the context was
clearly "official Unicode Character Names ... collecting evidence for
the error or suggested amendmend, ... wording a correction".
-- Peter Kirk email@example.com (personal) firstname.lastname@example.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 16 2005 - 05:16:11 CST