RE: Unicode Bloopers

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:18:39 CST

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Unicode lexer"

    > From: []
    > Behalf Of Andrew C. West

    > The bottom of this page also gives a list of Unicode characters that
    > mistakes that should never have been encoded in the first place. I've
    > got
    > one entry so far (U+156F "CANADIAN SYLLABICS TTH"), but I'm sure that
    > there are
    > quite a few lurking around (especially in the CJK-B block), so let me
    > if
    > you know of any.

    I know of entire ranges of characters (one of them quite large) that
    some would like to reckon this way. It wouldn't be appropriate to
    actually list them, however.

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:21:35 CST