Re: String name and Character Name

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Sun Apr 24 2005 - 01:50:37 CST

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: String name and Character Name"

    Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:

    > A Unicode registry of private characters would clearly need to define
    > what should be included, at least in order to avoid abuses. Since the
    > technology is able to handle it, it seems best to define the notion
    > of what should be considered to be a legitimate character for
    > registration, and then accommodate for that.

    It's hard enough to get people to agree on what is and isn't an
    encodable "character" just within the regular scripts, let alone the
    constructed ones.

    Doug Ewell
    Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 24 2005 - 01:53:44 CST