Re: String name and Character Name

From: Hans Aberg (
Date: Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:38:37 CST

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: String name and Character Name"

    At 00:50 -0700 2005/04/24, Doug Ewell wrote:
    >Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:
    >> A Unicode registry of private characters would clearly need to define
    >> what should be included, at least in order to avoid abuses. Since the
    >> technology is able to handle it, it seems best to define the notion
    >> of what should be considered to be a legitimate character for
    >> registration, and then accommodate for that.
    >It's hard enough to get people to agree on what is and isn't an
    >encodable "character" just within the regular scripts, let alone the
    >constructed ones.

    The stakes for the official code point range is much higher, making
    it difficult for people to agree.

       Hans Aberg

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:39:47 CST