From: Hans Aberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:38:37 CST
At 00:50 -0700 2005/04/24, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:
>> A Unicode registry of private characters would clearly need to define
>> what should be included, at least in order to avoid abuses. Since the
>> technology is able to handle it, it seems best to define the notion
>> of what should be considered to be a legitimate character for
>> registration, and then accommodate for that.
>It's hard enough to get people to agree on what is and isn't an
>encodable "character" just within the regular scripts, let alone the
The stakes for the official code point range is much higher, making
it difficult for people to agree.
-- Hans Aberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 24 2005 - 04:39:47 CST