From: Hans Aberg (email@example.com)
Date: Sat May 14 2005 - 12:29:29 CDT
At 17:44 +0100 2005/05/14, Peter Kirk wrote:
>On 14/05/2005 00:19, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>>That was the first time I saw the term "guillemet" in English.
>>Could I have incorrectly learned the term "guillemot" from
>>unreliable sources, or from other "standards"? May be it was in
>>glyph names for Postscript Level 1 fonts? I can't remember.
>Quite possibly you copied the error from others. Actually Andrey and
>Hans both used the incorrect form before you did in this thread, so
>I am not blaming you.
The error arouse from the original poster, the others copying it
over. The blame arouse with the blamer. :-)
-- Hans Aberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 14 2005 - 12:30:53 CDT