From: Alexander Kh. (email@example.com)
Date: Fri May 20 2005 - 14:43:18 CDT
I apologize for ambiguity of my phraze
> > what letters are
> > to be considered as meaningful and what letters are pure fantasy.
that resulted in so much fruitless debate. By saying "letters" I only
meant "letters", and not "scripts" which are so easy to confuse. In
fact, I have no objection to having fantasy scripts.
What I meant is for example, strange "semisoft sign" 048C which looks
same as Yate 0462. Is that someone's joke?
Or, for example letter 047C - Omega with titlo: why separate letter if
titlo is defined separately 0483 (is there a stateless way to encode a
titlo that spans several letters?). Next letter, however, 047E is indeed
a separate letter, and it is read as "ot" in text.
This is all while numeric titlo is missing alltogether: how would you
write Old Slavonic numerals in Unicode?
-- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 20 2005 - 14:44:05 CDT