RE: Decomposing kelvin?

From: Dominikus Scherkl (lyratelle@gmx.de)
Date: Fri Jun 10 2005 - 08:35:02 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: letters separated by markup & diacriticals"

    > > > The field 004B tells us, that U+212A decomposes
    > > > to U+004B, correct?
    > > Yes.

    > > > If so, then this seems wrong to me.
    > > No, it's a "compatibility decomposition", meaning if you can't
    > > represent it in your environment, simply show a 'K'.
    >
    > 212A;KELVIN SIGN;Lu;0;L;004B;;;;N;DEGREES KELVIN;;;006B;
    >
    > that looks wrong to me. Maybe it should look like this:
    >
    > 212A;KELVIN SIGN;Lu;0;L;<compat> 004B;;;;N;DEGREES KELVIN;;;006B;

    Uups. Yeah, you're right!
    It is realy canonically decomposable, because the glyph as well as the
    properties really identic to 'K'. But it's there only for round-trip
    conversion. That's the sence of "compatibility" I meant.

    Best Regards

    -- 
    Dominikus Scherkl
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 10 2005 - 08:36:46 CDT