From: Tom Emerson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jun 14 2005 - 08:50:07 CDT
Andrew West writes:
> > > > Lastly, there is a simplified version of U+939D with the standard
> > > > simplification (U+9485 [...]) of the Kangxi gold radical (U+2FA6 [...]),
> > > > but it doesn't seem to appear in Unicode anywhere at present.
> > >
> > > The simplified form is encoded at U+28C4F.
> > This form doesn't use the simplified gold radical, rather U+8345.
> Uh ? Looks like it does to me (simplified gold on the left, U+8345 on
> the right).
Right, my eyes are crossed this morning. Never mind.
> > Is this full/simple form mapping between U+939D and U+28C4F documented?
> > (I'm not trying to be a PITA, I'm trying to understand the process.)
> Doesn't look as if it is in Unihan, but then the
> traditional/simplified mappings in Unihan are known to be incomplete.
It isn't, they are, and hence the reason I asked the question. :-)
-- Tom Emerson Basis Technology Corp. Software Architect http://www.basistech.com "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 14 2005 - 08:51:02 CDT