Re: Baseline level line?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 04:59:10 CDT

  • Next message: N. Ganesan: "Arabic 16-bit encodings"

    At 01:27 -0700 2005-06-29, John Hudson wrote:

    >I'm looking for an immediate solution, but if there is nothing
    >better than U+005F, I'd also be interested to know if anyone thinks
    >it would be worthwhile to propose a baseline level line character
    >for this purpose.

    One would have to show it contrasting with LOW LINE, I suspect.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 30 2005 - 05:02:43 CDT