From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Aug 16 2005 - 14:03:44 CDT
I believe you *did* say that the stress must fall on the first breve. If that’s the case, there is no ambiguity wrt positioning of the mark.
From: Patrick Andries [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:54 AM
To: Peter Constable
Subject: Re: How to add stress to U+23D5 (Latin Metric) ?
Peter Constable a écrit :
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
I suppose you'd encode < 23D5, 030D > and adhere to the imperative you
mentioned when positioning the mark.
Well, I should have said that in this case the stress must necessarily fall on the first breve. I'm not sure that it could ever fall on the second one. I'm checking.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 16 2005 - 14:05:19 CDT