Re: Still OT, Re: VCR technical symbols?

From: Chris Jacobs (chris.jacobs@xs4all.nl)
Date: Wed Aug 31 2005 - 14:14:47 CDT

  • Next message: Magda Danish \(Unicode\): "FW: Subj: international standards for storing name and address data"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Adam Twardoch" <list.adam@twardoch.com>
    To: "Unicode Discussion" <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:04 PM
    Subject: Re: Still OT, Re: VCR technical symbols?

    > Michael Everson wrote:
    >
    > > One would encode MAN and WOMAN, of course.
    >
    > And HUMAN OF UNDETERMINED SEX.

    There is no need for a separate HUMAN OF UNDETERMINED SEX char.

    Following a long standing tradition it can be unified with MAN

    > And give them kaballistic codepoints with hidden biblical references.
    >
    > A.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 31 2005 - 14:23:46 CDT