unsubscribe please

From: Mike Hao (mike_jjhao@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:28:03 CDT

  • Next message: Kent_Spielmann@sil.org: "RE: [indic] Unicode Processing Requirements for Tamil (was: 28th IUC paper - Tamil Unicode New)"

    --- Curtis Clark <jcclark-lists@earthlink.net> wrote:

    > On 2005-08-28 11:14, David Starner wrote:
    > >>>To me, the criterion has always been "Does it
    > need to be exchanged
    > >>>electronically in plain text?"
    > >>
    > >>That's a good and clear criterion.
    > >
    > > I don't think it's a terribly clear criterion.
    >
    > The criterion itself is very clear, and "exchange",
    > "electronic", and
    > "plain text" in this context are well-understood. As
    > John Hudson pointed
    > out, it is the "need" that is slippery.
    >
    > --
    > Curtis Clark
    > http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
    > Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona +1
    > 909 979 6371
    > Professor, Biological Sciences +1
    > 909 869 4062
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:28:49 CDT