Re: U+2026 break behaviour

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 01:33:34 CDT

Next message: ndlogasundaram: "Mr. Kai Fu-Lee 's work connected with language recognition"

Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: U+2026 break behaviour"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: U+2026 break behaviour"
Next in thread: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: U+2026 break behaviour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela at cs dot tut dot fi> wrote:

>> Well, obviously that's not the expected behavior,
>
> It is - as far as Unicode is concerned. The line breaking classes
> of U+0021 and U+2026 are EX and IN, respectively...

Sorry, I misread Antonio's post and thought he meant a hard line break.
My bad. Thanks to Jukka for setting this straight and for the link to
his excellent page.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: ndlogasundaram: "Mr. Kai Fu-Lee 's work connected with language recognition"
Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: U+2026 break behaviour"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: U+2026 break behaviour"
Next in thread: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: U+2026 break behaviour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 05 2005 - 01:34:49 CDT