From: Marnen Laibow-Koser (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 09:16:07 CDT
On Sep 5, 2005, at 8:10 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Marnen Laibow-Koser, le Mon 05 Sep 2005 19:58:21 -0400, a écrit :
>> 1. If the reference glyph for MULTI-REST is changed, I fear that it
>> will break existing fonts and documents.
> Do documents really use the appearance, and not the name of the
> character ?
I'm not sure I understand your question, but what I meant was this.
It is possible that some fonts (and documents) have already been
created where the implementers took a look at the Standard, said "ah,
the 'MULTI-REST' is really a double whole rest", and went ahead and
used it as such. If we change the normative reference glyph for
MULTI-REST, it will indeed bring it in line with the name, but it may
produce backward-incompatible encoding.
-- |\ /| | _ |/ | Marnen Laibow-Koser | \/ | (\ |' |\ (- |\ |_ |\ | Poughkeepsie, NY, US Need Mac help? Call me at | email@example.com +1 (888) 464-3646 ext. 0158454! | http://www.marnen.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 09:17:41 CDT