From: Samuel Thibault (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 09:32:32 CDT
Marnen Laibow-Koser, le Tue 06 Sep 2005 10:16:07 -0400, a écrit :
> On Sep 5, 2005, at 8:10 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Marnen Laibow-Koser, le Mon 05 Sep 2005 19:58:21 -0400, a écrit :
> >>1. If the reference glyph for MULTI-REST is changed, I fear that it
> >>will break existing fonts and documents.
> >Do documents really use the appearance, and not the name of the
> >character ?
> I'm not sure I understand your question, but what I meant was this.
Yes, I understood the issue. But I personnaly rather look at symbol
names, not glyphs, when using unicode. Of course, who knows what people
do with unicode...
The only way to get out of the issue is to deprecate that symbol and
create a brand new one with correct name _and_ glyph.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 09:32:54 CDT