From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Sep 10 2005 - 03:45:18 CDT
At 17:36 -0700 2005-09-09, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>True. In part because the Klingon *script* is so poorly defined that
>it hardly deserves the term "script", and I've never seen a decent
>proposal for it that made any sense.
From a technical point of view, my proposal accurately described the
alphabetic use made of it by fans. Paramount does not use it
alphabetically, of course, and Okrand did not devise the ConScript.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 10 2005 - 06:07:11 CDT