From: David Starner (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Oct 19 2005 - 17:54:01 CST
On 10/19/05, Denis Jacquerye <email@example.com> wrote:
> Isn't inverted interrobang simply the sequence U+00BF + U+00A1 ?
No, no more than w is vv. Interrobang doesn't even have a
compatibility decomposition to ?! or !?, so it would be inconsistent
to treat inverted interrobang as anything but a unified character
(whether or not it's worth encoding). This just isn't the same as
accented characters that can be combined.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 19 2005 - 17:54:44 CST