Re: Punctuation character (inverted interrobang) proposed

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu Oct 20 2005 - 04:28:23 CST

  • Next message: Edward H. Trager: "Re: Lao Letter Fo Sung and Lao Letter Fo Tam"

    At 16:00 +0600 2005-10-20, Christopher Fynn wrote:

    >>But I don't know if this is the proper use of ZWJ.
    >I think this is proper use - after all you effectively want to
    >represent something which is like glyphs for each of the two other
    >characters *joined* sharing a common dot.

    It is a proper use if you want a ligature. An interrobang is not a
    decomposable "ligature" of ? amd !, however, though its origin is the
    fusion of the two. There's an important distinction there.

    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 04:37:05 CST