Re: LAO LETTER FO SUNG... wikipedia

From: David Starner (
Date: Thu Oct 20 2005 - 18:55:42 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Thai v. Lao (was: Lao Letter Fo Sung and Lao Letter Fo Tam)"
  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: CLDR proposal: Holiday rules"

    On 10/20/05, suzanne mccarthy <> wrote:
    > I would have to say that I have been told by more than one person who has a
    > website on a particular writing system and are therefore specialists in that
    > one language, that they do not find wikipedia accurate.
    > Two of them have told me that they have tried to revise wikipedia to be more
    > correct but were unable to get their revisions to 'stick' and have
    > consequently given up on it.

    We've found that many people have tried to revise Unicode to be more
    "correct" and thankfully some of them have given up. Just because they
    don't find Wikipedia accurate, doesn't mean they have a complete,
    neutral, understanding of the writing system.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 18:56:56 CST