From: Marion Gunn (mgunn@egt.ie)
Date: Sat Oct 22 2005 - 11:50:31 CST
Which is precisely what most 1990s experts worth their salt said (+10
yrs ago).
mg
Scríobh Philippe Verdy:
> ...
> Conclusion: the character identity is very weak. There must exist something
> else to confirm this identity. If the name is wrong, then there must exist a
> strong notice, part of the standard that explicitly says that, and explains
> the expected semantic
> ...
> To make this endorsement more normative, any possible confusion MUST be
> explained by Unicode itself, otherwise this is not a standard, and people
> will continue to use characters the way they want, and the Unicode standard
> would not even be needed (ISO/IEC 10646 would be enough)!
> ...
-- Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991) 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire. * mgunn@egt.ie * eamonn@egt.ie *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 22 2005 - 12:16:52 CST