Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Wed Oct 26 2005 - 08:45:07 CST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Improper grounds for rejection of proposal N2677"

Previous message: Denis Jacquerye: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
In reply to: Denis Jacquerye: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I doubt that Michael's original question:

"Do our Francophone colleagues propose changes to ISO 15924?"

was meant to start a free-form general discussion about French
orthographic standards.

I suggest that anyone who wishes to propose changes to the French names
in ISO 15924 should provide *exact* proposed names for *specific*
scripts, and should cite sources. Discussions of the names in CLDR
should probably go to the CLDR list.

Sticking my nose where it probably doesn't belong,

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Improper grounds for rejection of proposal N2677"
Previous message: Denis Jacquerye: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
In reply to: Denis Jacquerye: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: ISO 15924 and differences in French names of scripts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 26 2005 - 08:47:42 CST