From: faraz siddiqi (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 26 2005 - 10:39:25 CST
dear all does anyone know any ocr for urdu language ?
From: "Doug Ewell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Unicode Mailing List" <email@example.com>
CC: "Andrew S" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Improper grounds for rejection of proposal N2677
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:51:27 -0700
>Andrew S <asunic at mail dot ru> wrote:
> > WG2 is competent enough to understand that its cited justification
> > (that the new hex characters would be disruptive to existing
> > implementations) is clearly false, as I explained in my previous
> > message, yet that's the justification which it chose to cite.
> > Therefore there must have been some other reason which it didn't cite;
> > otherwise, it would have approved the proposal. It seemed to me that
> > the arguments which you mentioned were probably the actual reason for
> > rejecting the proposal, yet WG2 didn't cite those arguments; if they
> > were indeed the reason, then WG2 should have said so.
> > The fact that WG2 knowingly cited a false justification is the reason
> > why I said that the grounds were improper.
> > If the grounds for that rejection were proper, then it would also be
> > proper for WG2 to reject any arbitrary proposal on the grounds that
> > the moon is made of cheese.
>It's still not clear to me whether you are actually arguing in favor of
>the hex characters, arguing against the inclusion of the mathematical
>letters (it's far, far too late for that), or arguing that WG2 used
>inappropriate and inconsistent criteria for rejecting the former and
>approving the latter.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 26 2005 - 10:40:23 CST