From: Christopher Vance (unicode@nu.org)
Date: Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:54:11 CST
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:09:05PM -0800, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Good question. I'm not sure I have an answer. I'm just saying that
>creating a non-standard variant of UTF-8 that tries to preserve
>non-UTF-8 sequences isn't the right way to go.
Indeed. Pure UTF-8 filenames have worked flawlessly for years.
Mixing your character sets is far worse than mixing your drinks, so
"Just Say 'No'"... :-)
-- Christopher Vance
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 28 2005 - 23:55:42 CST