From: Chris Jacobs (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 29 2005 - 01:03:00 CST
Christopher Vance wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:09:05PM -0800, Doug Ewell wrote:
>> Good question. I'm not sure I have an answer. I'm just saying that
>> creating a non-standard variant of UTF-8 that tries to preserve
>> non-UTF-8 sequences isn't the right way to go.
> Indeed. Pure UTF-8 filenames have worked flawlessly for years.
What happens when two files have different, but canonical equivalent, file
> Mixing your character sets is far worse than mixing your drinks, so
> "Just Say 'No'"... :-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 29 2005 - 01:09:36 CST