Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Tue Dec 06 2005 - 18:51:01 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

    Michael Everson wrote:

    > At 02:50 +0300 2005-12-07, Bashar wrote:
    >
    >> off topic question, why its mm/dd/yy and not dd/mm/yy (or yyyy) in
    >> the US too (or is it in Europe and other part of the world except
    >> arab world) ?
    >
    >
    > It doesn't matter. The question is whether the US locale should be
    > mm/dd/yy or mm/dd/yyyy. I think it should be the latter.

    After all the fuss about Y2K six years ago, how can anyone seriously
    consider two-digit years? This shouldn't even be a question.

    ~mark

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 06 2005 - 18:52:00 CST