From: Mark E. Shoulson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Dec 06 2005 - 18:51:01 CST
Michael Everson wrote:
> At 02:50 +0300 2005-12-07, Bashar wrote:
>> off topic question, why its mm/dd/yy and not dd/mm/yy (or yyyy) in
>> the US too (or is it in Europe and other part of the world except
>> arab world) ?
> It doesn't matter. The question is whether the US locale should be
> mm/dd/yy or mm/dd/yyyy. I think it should be the latter.
After all the fuss about Y2K six years ago, how can anyone seriously
consider two-digit years? This shouldn't even be a question.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 06 2005 - 18:52:00 CST