From: Eric Muller (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Dec 06 2005 - 19:59:53 CST
Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> After all the fuss about Y2K six years ago, how can anyone seriously
> consider two-digit years? This shouldn't even be a question.
Apparently, a number of people are able to deal with the ambiguity of
two digit years without too much problem. I have not yet found a bank
cashier who told me "sorry, but this check is more than 100 years old,
we can't cash it" (or even less "sorry, this check is almost 100 years
in the future").
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 06 2005 - 20:02:00 CST