Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 09:06:36 CST

  • Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

    John D. Burger <john at mitre dot org> wrote:

    > As for the "unjustified fuss", we may never know for sure, but
    > arguably Y2K proved to not be a big problem exactly because people
    > made a lot of fuss, spent a lot of money, and rewrote a lot of code
    > (and database schemas).

    +1 

    --
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California, USA
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 09:24:49 CST