Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 11:28:26 CST

  • Next message: Peter Edberg: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

    At 08:46 -0800 2005-12-07, Mark Davis wrote:
    >CLDR is not in the business of trying to make policy; it is aimed at
    >reflecting current customary practice for the language/locale in

    In the absence of uniform customary practice, it has to make a
    decision, and as indicated, that will tend to influence customary
    practice in any case.

    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 11:30:04 CST