Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Peter Edberg (pedberg@apple.com)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 11:59:54 CST

  • Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

    I also favor yyyy-mm-dd; perhaps it is related to my preference for
    big-endian CPUs. :-)
    -Peter Edberg

    On Dec 6, 2005, at 9:38 PM, Peter Constable wrote:

    > And why I tend to favour yyyy-mm-dd (AFAIK, nobody ever uses yyyy-
    > dd-mm).
    >
    > Peter
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-
    >> bounce@unicode.org] On
    >> Behalf Of John Hudson
    >> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 4:33 PM
    >> Cc: Unicode Mailing List
    >> Subject: Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?
    >>
    >> ... Here in Canada...one encounters both mm/dd/yy and
    >> dd/mm/yy. Needless
    >> to say, this leads to ambiguity and confusion, which is one reason
    >> why I
    >> almost always
    >> used long form dates whenever possible.
    >>
    >> John Hudson



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 12:01:38 CST