From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2006 - 21:43:49 CST
Otto Stolz <Otto dot Stolz at uni dash konstanz dot de> wrote:
> The description in RFC 2152, chapter 4, is probably misleading to
> the uninitiated. The key to understanding is that all UTFs are
> equivalent: they encode the same character set, viz. the whole Uni-
> code, and any string encoded in one UTF can be easily transformed
> into any other.
I wouldn't have used the word "easy" to describe conversions into and
out of UTF-7. I'd reserve that for UTF-8 and -16 and -32, schemes that
can reasonably be done with pencil and paper.
-- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California, USA http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 28 2006 - 22:07:24 CST