From: SADAHIRO Tomoyuki (email@example.com)
Date: Wed May 10 2006 - 09:46:55 CDT
I did feedback about this through http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html
but is it better to talk here too?
Self introduction: I have an implementation of UAX#15
in the perl language
> Re: http://www.unicode.org/review/#pri86
> There is additional informative text in UAX #15: Normalization Forms
> based on text contributed by Ken Whistler, at
> Feedback is welcome.
Is a process which adopts this alternative approach to forbid
some characters still conformant with UAX#15?
I think no; this alternative approach breaks UAX15-C3,
as the conformance test includes the corrected mappings.
Then, how can the alternative approach, being inconformant,
contribute to the stability of Normalized Forms?
I assume noway; the forbidding just makes another result
that is different from that out of a conformant process.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 10 2006 - 11:25:10 CDT