From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Jun 04 2006 - 13:40:17 CDT
Theodore H. Smith <delete at elfdata dot com> wrote:
> You obviously know a bit more about Unicode than me, I'm not familiar
> with those glyphs or what the output should be, or even why my
> conversion table creation code didn't create the correct table to
> handle this case.
Please stop saying "glyphs" in this context. None of this discussion
has to do with the exact appearance of these characters, and how their
appearance might differ depending on the font or context or rendering
engine. That is what "glyph" refers to, and why it is different from
"character," the abstract concept of a unit of writing, or "code point,"
a numeric value to which a character may (or may not) be assigned.
Trying to help,
-- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California, USA http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 04 2006 - 13:46:36 CDT