From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jun 17 2006 - 05:43:07 CDT
At 12:10 +0200 2006-06-17, Kent Karlsson wrote:
>I think it would be better if 201B was NOT identified as a glyph
>variant of anything, and that for 2018 one never use the form of 201B.
I completely agree. As an aside, I have seen non-Latin text which
uses 201F as an opening quote and 201D as a closing quote. Chakma, I
think it was.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 17 2006 - 05:46:52 CDT