Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215

From: Richard Cook (
Date: Sun Jun 25 2006 - 19:35:12 CDT

  • Next message: Richard Cook: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"

    On Jun 25, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Richard Cook wrote:

    > On Jun 24, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
    >> Regarding the name of the first of the three proposed letters,
    >> shouldn’t that be TURNED E rather than INVERTED E?
    > I don't know, but, what I want to know is, how much closer does
    > this bring us to a Unicode _Finnegans Wake_? That book has a few
    > variously rotated E's, the encoding status of which I've been
    > vaguely thinking about checking.
    > But maybe Unicode's resident Irishman already knows the answer?

    here, I just generated a list of pages with "sigla/" in the html:

    Not only rotated E's, but F's etc.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 25 2006 - 19:38:46 CDT