Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215

From: Richard Cook (
Date: Sun Jun 25 2006 - 17:39:11 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"

    On Jun 24, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Peter Constable wrote:

    > Regarding the name of the first of the three proposed letters,
    > shouldn’t that be TURNED E rather than INVERTED E?
    I don't know, but, what I want to know is, how much closer does this
    bring us to a Unicode _Finnegans Wake_? That book has a few variously
    rotated E's, the encoding status of which I've been vaguely thinking
    about checking.

    But maybe Unicode's resident Irishman already knows the answer?

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 25 2006 - 17:44:25 CDT