RE: New RFC 4645-4647 (language tags)

From: Debbie Garside (debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2006 - 13:24:32 CDT

  • Next message: Debbie Garside: "RE: New RFC 4645-4647 (language tags)"

    Addison wrote:

    > It's pretty simple, actually. ISO 639-3 and ISO 639-2 share a
    > codespace.
    > That is, if you see a code 'xyz' in ISO 639-2, it will have
    > exactly the same meaning in ISO 639-3. If you see a code
    > 'xyz' in ISO 639-3, if it is assigned (or becomes assigned)
    > in ISO 639-2 it will have exactly the same meaning.
    >
    > No language will have two codes assigned in the registry.
    > Users will, presumably, choose the code that best meets their needs.

    This is true with regard to the alpha3 codes but there is a slight problem
    in that some of the descriptions (language reference names) currently differ
    between the two standards. The LTRU are currently discussing this problem.
    I would like to see both descriptions added.

    Best regards

    Debbie Garside
     

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: unicore-bounce@unicode.org
    > [mailto:unicore-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Addison Phillips
    > Sent: 12 September 2006 16:38
    > To: Mark E. Shoulson
    > Cc: Doug Ewell; Unicode Mailing List; UnicoRe Mailing List;
    > Philippe Verdy
    > Subject: Re: New RFC 4645-4647 (language tags)
    >
    > Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
    > >
    > > I think the question here (at least the question *I* have here), is
    > > that if and when ISO 4646 is made to include ISO 639-3,
    > given that ISO
    > > 639-3 and ISO 639-2 both use 3-letter codes, how will it be
    > possible
    > > to distinguish whether a 639-2 or a 639-3 code is being
    > used? Unless
    > > all of the 639-2 codes are subsumed into 639-3 (i.e. no one
    > code has
    > > incompatible meanings under the two standards). And in
    > that case, is
    > > 639-2 "deprecated" because 639-3 says everything it says, and more?
    > >
    > > This is such a simple question I feel stupid for asking it; surely
    > > this has been thought of and quickly dispensed with by the
    > committees.
    > >
    >
    > It's pretty simple, actually. ISO 639-3 and ISO 639-2 share a
    > codespace.
    > That is, if you see a code 'xyz' in ISO 639-2, it will have
    > exactly the same meaning in ISO 639-3. If you see a code
    > 'xyz' in ISO 639-3, if it is assigned (or becomes assigned)
    > in ISO 639-2 it will have exactly the same meaning.
    >
    > No language will have two codes assigned in the registry.
    > Users will, presumably, choose the code that best meets their needs.
    >
    > Addison
    >
    > --
    > Addison Phillips
    > Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
    >
    > Internationalization is an architecture.
    > It is not a feature.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 13 2006 - 13:25:45 CDT