From: Philippe Verdy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2006 - 05:16:32 CST
From: "Eric Muller" <email@example.com>
> Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> - most standards there are not very exciting.
> While not exciting, ISO/IEC 5218:2004 is certainly an interesting reading.
Beside the formalism, which looks more like a sample for future standard tables of standard codes, it is not so much interesting. 17 pages for a table of 4 distinct values coded on 1 digit! I just wonder what this standard can be really used for, and how even the standard is internationaly applicable for transgender people or foetus and yound children with ambiguous/mixed sexualdevelopment, due to various legislations.
Well it may just be exciting to speak about sex in a ISO/TC1 meeting! For Unicode however, the discussions about a few Bliss symbols samples (still not encoded) may have some interest.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 28 2006 - 05:34:14 CST