From: Hans Aberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2006 - 05:59:39 CST
On 28 Sep 2006, at 09:22, Eric Muller wrote:
> Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> - most standards there are not very exciting.
> While not exciting, ISO/IEC 5218:2004 is certainly an interesting
This standard is rather limited, as it does not admit indicating
various androgyny, transsexual and indeterminate sex conditions. I
think the Unicode character set has a similar shortcoming.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 28 2006 - 06:11:16 CST