From: Jefsey_Morfin (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2006 - 19:18:16 CST
At 18:56 29/09/2006, Hans Aberg wrote:
>On 29 Sep 2006, at 15:09, Jefsey_Morfin wrote:
>>we are in the language area, not in biology. So the real issue is how
>>the person see him/her/etcself ...
>I guess, that is the reason I bring it up, because there is a
>widespread, but faulty, view that mankind is divided into two
>physical sexes, and nothing else, and then standards come hardwired
>with that view.
>>... and how the language supports that
>This I do not see the point of. Unicode merely introduces a character
The character set is ISO 10646. Unicode provides additional files and
projects. The leading one is the CLDR. This project is where all the
peculiarities you discuss should be documented.
>>Ages are also important in languages, so are trades and
>>contexts. In our computer assisted/man-machine relation, the genders
>>"computer" and "agent" should be available. So we would often need
>>singular, plural, networked.
>I do not see what this has to to with characters for human physical
Unicode's globalization doctrine (internationalization of the
environment + localization of the edges) is stabilised by BCP 47 and
RFC 4646 by Mark Davis and Addison Phillips; They provides a
consistent language tagging [language, characters, region] for the
environment (pages and protocols), localization (CLDR files), and
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 29 2006 - 21:12:08 CST