Re: Unicode and RFC 4690

From: Steve Summit (
Date: Wed Oct 04 2006 - 13:18:19 CST

  • Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Should names for sexes be included into CLDR?"

    Ken Whistler wrote:
    >> Are there any established, respected, comprehensive repositories of such
    >> equivalences?

    Thank you! That's exactly what I had in mind. (And now I'm
    surprised that RFC 4690 doesn't make more mention of this work.
    It does cite TR39, but only in passing.)

    > The issue of visual confusability in host names (and IRIs in
    > general) relates even to such ASCII-derived confusable pairs
    > as O/0 and I/l/1,


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 04 2006 - 13:20:48 CST