Re: UTS#40 (BOCU-1) ambiguity and possible serious bug about leading BOM

From: Markus Scherer (markus.icu@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2007 - 18:16:19 CST

Next message: Markus Scherer: "Re: UTS#40 (BOCU-1) special handling of large blocks"

Previous message: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "Re: writing Chinese dialects"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTS#40 (BOCU-1) ambiguity and possible serious bug about leading BOM"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: New translation posted"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks for the various good comments. If UTS #40 progresses or we roll
an update to UTN #6 I will dig these out of my mailbox and incorporate
them.

Note that the signature issue is the same for all stateful charsets -
like UTF-7 and SCSU. (Luckily for SCSU, it has a very good and now
recommended way to encode an initial U+FEFF with SQU without
disturbing the following characters.)

Best regards,
markus

Next message: Markus Scherer: "Re: UTS#40 (BOCU-1) special handling of large blocks"
Previous message: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "Re: writing Chinese dialects"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTS#40 (BOCU-1) ambiguity and possible serious bug about leading BOM"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "Re: New translation posted"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 07 2007 - 18:20:25 CST