Re: Uppercase is coming? (U+1E9E)

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 01:34:30 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Uppercase is coming? (U+1E9E)"

    On 5/7/2007 11:04 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
    > My thinking is that an uppercase form of should
    > always look similar to `SS' -- as TeX shows, which has introduced an
    > `SS' glyph about 20 years ago to make uppercasing give correct visual
    > results. To make an `SS' glyph distinguishable from `S' `S', as
    > needed in official documents like passports, why not adding a small
    > `ligature connection' similar to the bow in the `ct' ligature glyphs
    > formerly used in French typography (see attached image)?
    >
    >
    Given the way the recent reform assigns a function to the sharp-s, I
    suspect readers will, over time, want to see that function more directly
    visually represented also in uppercase. Typographic variation on the SS
    will not address that need.

    > I think that having a glyph for uppercase `' is a very good idea.
    > Whether having a separate code point for that is something I don't
    > dare to decide.
    >
    >
    > Werner
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 08 2007 - 01:35:49 CDT